Detail stylizer nik6/8/2023 Some of this is probably because I am doing it all in the RAW conversion stage. Using these filters? If time were not an issue, would you always use Resulting image quality? Do you think that you lose something when After I have added other layers I can still go back and adjust any or all of the Nik settings.īut how would you say the results compare purely based on the This plug-in version is actually far better than the Photoshop version for that reason. ![]() With Capture NX2 it doesn't creat a duplicate of the image. It's not as flexible or powerful as using photoshop, but respectable. Process my images very quickly and get decent results. Really like that I can use the plugins very quickly without startingĪ new program (unfortunately, it creates a duplicate of the image forĮdit, but this is a limitation of Aperture). I use Apple's Aperture, which supports the Nik plugins. I'm still using CS2 so I'm not sure but I don't think smart layers in CS3 would help you here.įor my money Nik Color Efex Pro 3.0 is a much better investment than a Photoshop upgrade at this point considering what the last 2 Photoshop upgrades have been. You can approximate the same thing with Photoshop by recording actions. That won't help you as much if you aren't a Nikon user and it is an extra expense. I can save a very complete look with multiple filters as a set of pre-set (and adjustable) layers and make minor tweaks. These days I have been using Color Efex Pro 3 as a Nikon Capture NX2 plug-in which has cut my Photoshop time to a very small percentage of the overall workflow. They are amazing compared to any method of selecting in native Photoshop. If you do go with Nik take a lot of time tinkering with multiple control points in the view selection mode to really understand how they interact. Selectively adding effects with control points is very powerful. With the Nik filters there's another huge advantage. I've been using Nik filters for a few years.Īs someone else said, filters really aren't going to give you capabilities that aren't already in Photoshop but it makes them easier and more visually interactive. I know most of you are masters of photoshop, but for the user who wishes to spend less time at post-processing, do you think these tools are a good investment? Does anyone use Vivenza, what are the opinions on this? Again, I find it very expensive, but maybe it can be justified? I've seen beautiful B&W conversions done with SilverEffects, but $200? Very hard to justify. I would say it's easy to abuse these, but in general they do tend to improve the shots when used in moderation. I like the effects of Glamour Glow, Classical Soft focus. ![]() The skylight filter makes a lot of shots look much warmer, in a way that is not at all like changing the white balance. For example, the dynamic skin softener seems to work really well in almost all cases (you do have to use it very modestly to avoid "plastic" skin). It seems to me that these filters allow you to get some interesting results with just a few mouse clicks. I'm just an amateur and would have trouble justifying $300 for such software, but at the same time I don't like spending too much time processing my images. ![]() I'd like to hear from experienced retouchers about their overall impression of the filters? I know in most cases, the same effects can be acheived in photoshop, but do some of you still use these on a regular basis in your workflow? I've played with the trial of Nik Color Efex 3.0 and really liked some of the filters.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |